Bibliografía Temática de la Lingüística Española - Apéndice 1 (Bite-Ap1)
Título Original |
The Background to the Lexical Content of the Nuevo Tesoro Lexicográfico del Español (s. XIV–1726) |
Autor/a | |
Resumen |
This article sets out the sources, both lexicographical and other, used to create the Nuevo Tesoro Lexicográfico del Español (s. XIV–1726). Among these, particular attention is due to the pre-1500 sources, especially the works of Antonio de Nebrija (1444?–1522), because of their importance for subsequent lexicography, including the pioneers of bilingual lexicography who set Spanish alongside another language. Information is also supplied about the number of works and records consulted, the difficulties arising from treating the data, and the method adopted for grouping together variants of the same form. Finally, an indication is given of the interest of the NTLE for the history of lexicography.
|
Notas |
1. Introduction | 2. The NTLE and Gili Gaya’s Tesoro lexicográfico | 3. Selection of material | 3.1 Questions of a methodological nature | 3.2 Chronology | 3.2.1 Materials earlier than 1500: Nebrija | 3.2.2 Material after 1500 | 3.2.3 Plurilingual alphabetic lexical works | 3.2.4 Nomenclatures | 3.2.5 Plurilingual scientific and technical works: The case of the Dioscorides | 4. Working method | 4.1 Limitations imposed on the sources | 4.2 Grouping of variants | 4.3 The final result | 4.4 Difficulties presented in the scientific lexical works | 5. Historiographic value of the NTLE
|
Año de publicación |
2009
|
Revista académica |
Historiographia Linguistica
|
Volumen |
XXXVI
|
Número de Volumen |
1
|
Número de páginas |
19-38
|
Inglés
|
|
Editorial |
John Benjamins Publishing Company
|
Numero ISSN |
0302-5160
|
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.1075/hl.36.1.02alv
|
Cuadro-clasificacion | |
Epoca | |
Disciplina | |
Artículo de revista académica
|
|
linguistas |
BiTe-Ap1 es una herramienta historiográfica y metahistoriográfica; se entiende como un recurso secundario –i.e. como un acceso a una información organizada– pero también como un recurso primario, dado que se convierte en un objeto de estudio en sí mismo (Galina-Russell 2012)